39%
28.11.2023
of support (e.g., for Windows Server 2008/2008 R2 and Windows Server 2012/2012 R2) for up-to-date Azure VM operating systems have been free thus far. This point is interesting because even if companies use
39%
08.10.2015
the following versions on the Windows Server side:
2003 SP2
2008 SP2
2008 R2 SP1
2012
2012 R2
On Windows Server 2003, a few limitations are described in the release notes and the EMET user
39%
16.05.2013
in sizes from 1.2 to 3.2TB.
Infos
Database acceleration with VXL: http://www.oczenterprise.com/whitepapers/whitepaper-accelerating-ms-sql-server-2012.pdf
39%
12.11.2013
utility 50Hertz was temporarily disrupted under a DDoS attack. In 2012, US banks, including Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and many others, were hit by a wave of DDoS attacks that, although
39%
20.06.2022
authentication code)). HTTPS and TLS 1.3 are the defaults in Windows Server 2022. When clients connect to the server, the server tries to use HTTPS and TLS 1.3, if possible.
Cluster nodes in Windows Server 2022 ... The release of Windows Server 2022 adds some new security features to its server operating system that might not be earth-shattering; however, you will find Secured-core, DNS over HTTPs, TLS 1.3
39%
11.02.2016
Accounts: https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Configuration-of-General-and-Notification-Settings-6ad3a53f-470f-4f15-ad31-aca147385449
39%
09.08.2015
for virtual machines that is suitable for recovery from server failures (Figure 1). Thus far, VM snapshots (which Microsoft has dubbed "checkpoints" since 2012) have caused serious errors in applications
39%
14.11.2013
on the Internet.
After Spamhaus commissioned cloud security provider CloudFlare [3] to defend its infrastructure, it was able to resume its usual services. The attackers, however, didn't give up. A week later
39%
01.06.2024
environment to reconstruct the plaintext password (offline cracking). Because the leading ransomware gangs already tapped into the as-a-service business model some time ago, the GPU power required for cracking
39%
04.10.2018
up to 99,999 hours using Group Policy [3]. That's almost 11.5 years.
This scenario can lead to subsequent abuse of access rights by an attacker, even if you disable the associated user account