Professional virtualization with RHV4


Containers and VMs

In addition to OpenStack, RHV4 also supports container-based workloads, as exemplified, for example, in its support of RHEL Atomic Host as a guest system. The expansion or the configurability of policies for live migration is also new, offering benefits in particular for Monster VMs or live migration. For example, RHV4 allows fine tuning of live migration settings for a selected VM cluster level, such as the maximum bandwidth to use. Another new feature is that RHV can now deal with tags and labels that you can assign as a characteristic property to a VM or network.

RHV4 and Competitors

RHV leaves you with a mixed impression. In 2017, you are hardly likely to find companies that have not already gained experience with some kind of virtualization solution. RHV is thus mainly a strategic product both for Red Hat and for users; using it leaves the doors open in many directions, although the dice seem to have fallen in favor of OpenStack for the private cloud. Looking specifically at functions, RHV tends to focus on integration as a whole rather than maximizing virtualization functionalities. For example, the upcoming modeling of the Open vSwitch-based virtual networking stack is long overdue. Competitor VMware has for years offered fully modeled, software-defined Layer 2 switches that operate on par with Cisco in terms of APIs and features.

As another example, consider the ability of RHV4 to add tags and labels to objects – a function that competitors have also had for a long time. VMware also has more to offer in terms of resource management and prioritization, or performance monitoring. Whether the feature overkill in vSphere actually reflects the needs of enterprises in everyday life is a totally different question. However, what is irritating about RHV is that, in principle, no clear separation exists between the functions provided by the Linux kernel and other layers in RHEL that can typically only be configured at the command line. For open source specialists, this might be the norm, but in the context of Hyper-V and vSphere, it becomes difficult to compare capabilities, especially when some features advertised in RHV4 have received only a tech preview status.

Don't forget that the competitors (Hyper-V and vSphere) offer a powerful PowerShell-based Automation API. Die-hard Red Hat aficionados might turn up their noses at the mention of PowerShell, but it has developed into a reliable tool as an automation and management interface outside of the Linux world. If Red Hat is targeting VMware and Microsoft migrants with RHV4, things like this – when taking the fairly jaded look of the GUI and its missing functions into account – will be quite important. Of course, you have to remember that Ansible has a chic oVirt module. Dozens of VMs can be very easily cloned, preconfigured, and booted thanks to playbooks (Cloud-init).


In terms of costs, RHV4 is still a recommended product, especially when stability, enterprise capability, and performance leave little to complain about. Last but not least, RHV is possibly the better container platform than, for example, Windows Server 2016 Container Host or VMware because of its proximity to Linux and Docker.

The Author

Thomas Drilling has been a full-time freelance journalist and editor for science and IT magazines for more than 10 years. He and his team make contributions on the topics of open source, Linux, servers, IT administration, and Mac OS X. Drilling is also a book author and publisher, advises small and medium-sized enterprises as an IT consultant, and lectures on Linux, open source, and IT security.

Buy this article as PDF

Express-Checkout as PDF
Price $2.95
(incl. VAT)

Buy ADMIN Magazine

Get it on Google Play

US / Canada

Get it on Google Play

UK / Australia

Related content

  • Managing Virtual Infrastructures

    Version 3.1 of the oVirt management platform for virtual infrastructures has recently become available. On Fedora 17, the new release is easy to install and deploy.

  • Open Source VDI solution with RHEV and oVirt
    Red Hat introduces a management system for KVM-based virtualization based on Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization and open source project oVirt. Now, solutions for desktop virtualization can be implemented without using proprietary software.
  • Live migration of virtual machines with KVM
    Live migration of virtual machines is necessary when you need to achieve high-availability setups and load distribution.
  • Alternative virtualization solutions when OpenStack is too much
    OpenStack is considered the industry standard for building private clouds, but the solution is still far too complex and too difficult to maintain and operate for many applications. What causes OpenStack projects to fail, and what alternatives do administrators have?
  • Fedora 18 as a server distribution
    Fedora is a trend-setting distribution that sets the pace for future developments of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Administrators, regardless of whether they use Fedora, are well advised to look at the newest innovations of the Fedora distribution.
comments powered by Disqus
Subscribe to our ADMIN Newsletters
Subscribe to our Linux Newsletters
Find Linux and Open Source Jobs

Support Our Work

ADMIN content is made possible with support from readers like you. Please consider contributing when you've found an article to be beneficial.

Learn More”>


		<div class=