Admin Magazine
 
  • News
  •  
  • Articles
  •  
  • Tech Tools
  •  
  • Subscribe
  •  
  • Archive
  •  
  • Whitepapers
  •  
  • Digisub
  •  
  • Write for Us!
  •  
  • Newsletter
  •  
  • Shop
  • DevOps
  • Cloud Computing
  • Virtualization
  • HPC
  • Linux
  • Windows
  • Security
  • Monitoring
  • Databases
  • all Topics...
Search
Login
ADMIN Magazine on Facebook
GooglePlus

Search

Refine your search
Sort order
  • Date
  • Score
Content type
  • Article (Print) (72)
  • Article (48)
  • Blog post (1)
  • News (1)
Keywords
Creation time
  • Last day
  • Last week
  • Last month
  • Last three months
  • Last year

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13 Next »

18%
Profiling Python code
30.01.2020
Home »  Archive  »  2020  »  Issue 55: AWS L...  » 
Lead Image ©-Yong Hian Lim, Fotolia.com
| %|Source code ------+----------+-------------+-------------+-------+----------- 1| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%|# md test code 2| 0| 0| 0| 0.00
18%
Monitoring Performance with sar
05.03.2014
Home »  Articles  » 
:15:01        all      2.08      0.00      0.96      0.02      0.00     96.94 12:25:01        all      1.96      0.00      0.82      0.06      0.00     97.16 12:35:01 PM     all      1.22      0.00      0.73      0.00      0.00
18%
Collecting and evaluating performance data over a period of time
20.03.2014
Home »  Archive  »  2014  »  Issue 19: Perim...  » 
Lead Image © Sergey Nivens, 123RF.com
all 1.22 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 98.05 12:45:01 PM all 1.32 0.00 0.72 0.01 0.00 97.95 12:55:01 PM all 1.79 0.00 0.75 0
18%
The practical benefits of network namespaces
15.08.2016
Home »  Archive  »  2016  »  Issue 34: Softw...  » 
Lead Image © Morganimation, fotolia.com
-> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:03.0/net/eth0 |---lo -> ../../devices/virtual/net/lo The device is no longer listed in the default namespace. Listing 3 Configuring Devices $ ip link set eth1
17%
Arp Cache Poisoning and Packet Sniffing
05.09.2011
Home »  Articles  » 
 
can see how the arp cache poisoning works: $ sudo nemesis arp -v -r -d eth0 -S 192.168.1.2 \ -D 192.168.1.133 -h 00:22:6E:71:04:BB -m 00:0C:29:B2:78:9E \ -H 00:22:6E:71:04:BB -M 00:0C:29:B2:78:9E
17%
Processor and Memory Metrics
12.02.2014
Home »  HPC  »  Articles  » 
.py  CPU ALL:  1.0  %  CPU0    4.1%  CPU1    2.0%  CPU2    0.0%  CPU3    0.0%  CPU4    0.0%  CPU5    0.0%  CPU6    0.0%  CPU7    2.0%  CPU ALL:    user:      0.7%  nice:    0.0%    system:    0.2%  idle
17%
Load Testing the Cloud
20.02.2012
Home »  CloudAge  »  Blogs  »  Dan Frost's Blog  » 
 
time: 11.79 secs Data transferred: 2.47 MB Response time: 0.22 secs Transaction rate: 35.79 trans/sec Throughput: 0
17%
Linux Writecache
19.11.2019
Home »  HPC  »  Articles  » 
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w(1)][100.0%][w=654MiB/s][w=167k IOPS][eta 00m:00s] test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=1225: Sat Oct 12 19:20:18 2019   write: IOPS=168k, BW=655MiB/s (687MB/s)(10.0GiB/15634msec); 0
17%
Linux device mapper writecache
30.01.2020
Home »  Archive  »  2020  »  Issue 55: AWS L...  » 
Lead Image © lightwise, 123R.com
=1): err= 0: pid=1634: Mon Oct 14 22:18:59 2019 write: IOPS=118k, BW=463MiB/s (485MB/s)(10.0GiB/22123msec); 0 zone resets [ ... ] Run status group 0 (all jobs): WRITE: bw=463MiB/s (485MB/s), 463Mi
17%
I/O Profiling at the Block Level
27.08.2014
Home »  HPC  »  Articles  » 
was the sequential write test using 1MB record sizes: ./iozone -i 0 -c -e -w -r 1024k -s 32g -t 2 -+n > iozone_write_1.out To gather the block statistics, I ran ioprof in a different terminal window before I ran

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13 Next »

Service

  • Article Code
  • Contact
  • Legal Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Glossary
    • Backup Test
© 2025 Linux New Media USA, LLC – Legal Notice