49%
27.08.2014
was the random read and write test with small record sizes and a smaller total file size (a kind of random IOPS run):
./iozone -i 2 -w -r 4k -I -O -w -+n -s 4g -t 2 -+n > iozone_random_1.out
The total file size
49%
12.02.2014
B hald-addon-input
...
22.9 MiB + 4.0 MiB = 26.9 MiB plasma-desktop
26.0 MiB + 5.7 MiB = 31.7 MiB konsole (3)
28.3 MiB + 4.4 MiB = 32.7 MiB kwin
41.0 MiB + 2.0 MiB = 43.0 MiB Xorg
146.9
49%
16.01.2013
$ starcluster start -s 1 foocluster -n ami-999d49f0
$ starcluster get foocluster /opt/sge6-fresh .
$ starcluster terminate foocluster
$ starcluster start -o -s 1 -i t1.micro -n ami-e2a0058b imagehost
49%
01.06.2024
simulations.
sudo apt install openmpi-bin openmpi-common openmpi-doc libopenmpi-dev
The code as listed runs 1 million iterations, which I can launch over two Xeon Broadwell cores,
mpiexec -n 2 mpi
49%
09.01.2019
of the loop, n
, is large enough, some processing hardware can greatly speed up the computation.
What happens if z(i)
depends on a previous value, as in the following:
do i = 2,n
z(i) = z(i-1)*2
enddo
49%
16.08.2018
| nova | compute |
| 266b6275884945d39dbc08cb3297eaa2 | ceilometer | metering |
| 4f0ebe86b6284fb689387bbc3212f9f5 | cinder | volume |
| 59392edd44984143bc47a89e111beb0a
49%
07.03.2019
; you should collapse two or more loops.
Table 4: Collapsing Loops
Fortran
C
!$acc parallel loop collapse(2)
do i=1,n
...
do j=1,m
...
enddo
49%
05.09.2011
can see how the arp cache poisoning works:
$ sudo nemesis arp -v -r -d eth0 -S 192.168.1.2 \
-D 192.168.1.133 -h 00:22:6E:71:04:BB -m 00:0C:29:B2:78:9E \
-H 00:22:6E:71:04:BB -M 00:0C:29:B2:78:9E
49%
01.06.2024
Running hunger-check 0 56218b2e56fa8 hunger-check-deployment-96b6764f9-7zsbk
cbdd56829a054 0ff4eace8cd5b 2 months ago Running metadata
49%
05.02.2019
if z(i) depends on a previous value, as in the following:
do i = 2,n
z(i) = z(i-1)*2
enddo
As written, you can't generally parallelize the loop because of data dependency [4]. This dependency
