Lead Image © KrishnaKumar Sivaraman, 123RF.com

Lead Image © KrishnaKumar Sivaraman, 123RF.com

Troubleshooting and maintenance in Ceph

First Aid

Article from ADMIN 16/2013
By
We look into some everyday questions that administrators with Ceph clusters tend to ask: What do I do if a fire breaks out or I run out of space in the cluster?

In the past year in ADMIN magazine and ADMIN Online, I have introduced RADOS object store devices (OSDs), monitoring servers (MONs), and metadata servers (MDSs), along with the Ceph filesystem [1]. I looked at how the cluster takes care of internal redundancy of stored objects, what possibilities exist besides Ceph for accessing the data in the object store, and how to avoid pitfalls [2]. I also talked about CephX Ceph encryption and how a Ceph cluster could be used as a replacement for classic block storage in virtual environments [3]. Now, it's time to talk about what to do when things go wrong.

Those of you who already have a Ceph cluster will be familiar with the frequent visits to the wild and woolly world of system administration. Although various functions are integrated in Ceph that make working with the object store as pleasant as possible, this much is clear: Things can go wrong with a Ceph cluster, too (e.g., hard drives can die and run out of space). In this article, I aim to give you some tips, at least for the major topics of everyday admin life, so you know what to do – just in case.

How Healthy Is Your Cluster?

From an administrative point of view, it is quite interesting and useful to see what the cluster is doing at any given time. Ceph offers several ways to retrieve status information for the cluster. The catchiest command is undoubtedly:

ceph health

In an ideal case, this only creates one line as output – that is, HEALTH_OK . If the output says HEALTH_WARN or even HEALTH_ERR , things are not quite so rosy. At that point, it is up to the administrator to obtain more accurate information about the state of the cluster. The ceph health detail command helps you do so. If you have a HEALTH_OK state, you will not see any output. For HEALTH_WARN and HEALTH_ERR , however, you definitely will (Figure 1), and you need to know how to distinguish the individual states.

Figure 1: The 'ceph health detail' command not only reveals a problem, it tells exactly what the problem is.

HEALTH_WARN first tells the administrator to look for a problem with the placement groups (PGs). Placement groups can have different states, some of which trigger the warning status: This is always the case if your replication settings are no longer fulfilled. HEALTH_WARN is not necessarily a cause for concern. If, for example, an OSD within the cluster fails, the health state of the cluster will automatically transition to HEALTH_WARN in the default configuration after five minutes because the storage system is missing some replicas – the ones on the failed OSD. Once the self-healing procedure is completed, the state will automatically return to HEALTH_OK . For a detailed overview of the most important states for placement groups in Ceph, see Table 1.

Table 1

Placement Group Status Messages

Status Meaning
Down No more devices in the cluster have the properties of the PG. The PG is therefore offline.
Peering The PG is going through a peering process, in which the state of the PG is compared on different OSDs.
Inconsistent Ceph has determined that PGs are not consistent across different OSDs.
Scrubbing Ceph is currently investigating the PG for inconsistencies.
Repair Ceph is correcting inconsistent PGs so that they again meet the replication requirements.
Degraded Not as many replicas exist as the replication policy dictates for a PG in the cluster.
Stale Ceph has not received any information about the state of the PG from the OSDs since the assignment of PGs to the OSDs last changed.

When the state of the Ceph cluster changes to HEALTH_ERR , you have real cause for concern. One thing is clear: You have a problem within the cluster that Ceph alone cannot resolve, and this makes intervention by the admin necessary. To discover what you can do, you need to run

ceph health detail

as mentioned before. On the basis of the list in Table 1 and the output from the command, you can deduce what approach makes sense.

In particular, the part about the health status is relevant for precise error analysis; it describes the current state of monitoring servers and OSDs in detail. If placement groups are listed as Stale or even as Down , often the cluster has lost multiple OSDs (e.g., two hard disks have given up the ghost in two independent servers).

Such scenarios occur much more frequently if something is wrong with the network or power connection in the cluster. Sometimes, several computers fail simultaneously for the same reason; this kind of incident would look very similar in the Ceph status view. It is important for the admin to bring the OSDs with the missing placement groups back online as quickly as possible. To discover which OSDs are missing, check the results in the OSD line of ceph health detail.

Similar to ceph health is the Ceph watch mode,

ceph -w

(Figure 2), which works in a similar way but displays an ongoing status report that is updated by events. You can tell several things from the output. In this case, all the disks (OSDs) in the cluster are behaving normally, with no failures of the monitoring or metadata servers (if the local installation uses the latter). The output also tells you that all the placement groups in Ceph are working correctly in terms of replication rules.

Figure 2: In watch mode: HEALTH_OK is the order of the day in this cluster.

Responding Correctly to OSD Problems

If it turns out that the cause of a problem in Ceph is difficulties with one or more individual OSDs, administrators can look forward to some real work. In the simplest case, the cluster or individual OSDs are just full; in this specific case, you would merely need to add new disks to the cluster. Administrators should understand that not all OSDs in the cluster need to be full for cluster to be unable to perform its functions. Ceph alerts you as soon as it assumes it will be unable to fulfill your replication policy.

Adding new OSDs is an option. Here, I'll add a single disk to a fictitious host named charlie . The first step is to find out what ID the new OSD will have, so you need to find out the highest ID currently assigned to an OSD. The

ceph osd tree

command helps you do so (Figure 3). In this specific example, the last OSD in the cluster is osd.2 – that is, the OSD with ID 2 (counting starts at 0).

Figure 3: Displaying the OSD structure of the cluster lets you discover the next available OSD ID.

The next OSD will then have ID 3 On Charlie, you need to create the OSD directory:

mkdir -p /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-3

The example assumes the new OSD on host Charlie is the HDD /dev/sdc. Next, you need to create a filesystem,

mkfs.xfs -L osd.3 -i size=2048 /dev/sdc

then add the new filesystem to /etc/fstab so it is automatically mounted at system startup. An entry that refers to the label would be,

LABEL=osd.3 /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-3 xfs defaults 0 0

The mount -a command immediately enables the new filesystem. The new OSD then can be added to /etc/ceph/ceph.conf on one of the computers that is already part of the cluster – here, the host is daisy . Because the sample sticks to the default paths, you just need the following entry:

[osd.3] host = charlie

The new ceph.conf must be copied to all the hosts that have active OSDs, and it should also end up on Charlie. If you have not already done so, it is also recommended to copy the access key for client.admin from an existing OSD host to charlie. Entering

scp root@daisy:/etc/ceph/keyring.admin /etc/ceph

on Charlie does the trick. You can carry out all further steps of the instructions on Charlie just by copying; however, if that does not work, you would need to switch constantly between one of the existing OSD hosts and Charlie.

To create the new OSD internally in Ceph, create the OSD structure on the new disk, and generate the CephX key for the new OSD, you can use:

ceph osd create
ceph-osd -i 3 --mkfs --mkkey

The new key needs to be loaded into the existing keyring immediately:

ceph auth add osd.3 osd 'allow *' mon 'allow rwx' -i /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-3/keyring

Finally, the new OSD needs a value in the CRUSH map, that releases it for use:

ceph osd crush set osd.3 1.0 rack=unknownrack host=charlie

This is followed by launching the OSD on Charlie by typing:

service ceph start

From now on, the Ceph cluster will include the new disk in its CRUSH computations and store data there.

Complex OSD Failures

As mentioned previously, the best situations are those in which the administrator quickly returns lost OSDs to the cluster. However, that does not always happen, especially when disks are broken. If you use the default configuration and two disks with replicas of the same placement group fail, the placement group is lost to Ceph by definition, unless you can recover from somewhere (e.g., a backup). Ceph is configured by default so that, rather than immediately returning an error when you try to access incomplete PGs, it simply blocks the I/O operation. If you can find the data somewhere, you can restore it to the cluster at any time. If you have no hope of restoring data, you should declare the OSD lost . For this, you need to know which OSD has failed; again, the output from ceph -w helps by showing which placement groups are down . If you are sure a placement group is not recoverable, the command is:

ceph pg <PG-ID> mark_unfound_lost revert

Now the cluster knows about the problem, too. If you want to declare a whole OSD dead, the

ceph osd lost <ID>

command does this for you. Both steps entail permanent loss of data, but equivalent commands can return the cluster to a working state.

At the monitoring server level, Ceph uses a Paxos algorithm to prevent split-brain situations. Split brain in the cluster context usually refers to a scenario in which replicated storage decays into several parts; clients from the outside then have uncoordinated, simultaneous write access to these different parts. The two replicas of the cluster, which should always be in sync, develop in divergent ways; ultimately, the admin can only save one of the two sets of data, unless they can be glued back together manually. Ceph prevents such scenarios with a quorum decision.

Buy ADMIN Magazine

SINGLE ISSUES
 
SUBSCRIPTIONS
 
TABLET & SMARTPHONE APPS
Get it on Google Play

US / Canada

Get it on Google Play

UK / Australia

Related content

  • Ceph Maintenance

    We look into some everyday questions that administrators with Ceph clusters tend to ask: What do I do if a fire breaks out or I run out of space in the cluster?

  • Getting Ready for the New Ceph Object Store

    The Ceph object store remains a project in transition: The developers announced a new GUI, a new storage back end, and CephFS stability in the just released Ceph v10.2.x, Jewel.

  • Ceph object store innovations
    The Ceph object store remains a project in transition: The developers announced a new GUI, a new storage back end, and CephFS stability in the just released Ceph c10.2.x, Jewel.
  • The RADOS Object Store and Ceph Filesystem

    Scalable storage is a key component in cloud environments. RADOS and Ceph enter the field, promising to support seamlessly scalable storage.

  • SDS configuration and performance
    Software-defined storage promises centrally managed, heterogeneous storage with built-in redundancy. We examine how complicated it is to set up the necessary distributed filesystems. A benchmark shows which operations each system is best at tackling.
comments powered by Disqus