22%
25.03.2021
[1] sdc1[0]
244065408 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
[=>...................] resync = 6.4% (15812032/244065408) finish=19.1min speed=198449K/sec
bitmap: 2/2 pages [8KB], 65536KB chunk
22%
20.05.2014
Viewing Server Topology
01 # numactl --hardware
available: 8 nodes (0-7)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
node 0 size: 16373 MB
node 0 free: 15837 MB
node 1 cpus: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
node 1
22%
12.09.2013
approx. US$ 600
approx. US$ 335
CPU
Via Eden X2/1GHz
Via Eden X2/1GHz
AMD G-T44R/1.2GHz
AMD G-T56N/1.6GHz
Marvell ARMADA PXA 510 v7.1
Chipset
22%
05.08.2024
run("row")
09 }
10 }
11
12 func BenchmarkColumn(b *testing.B) {
13 //b.ResetTimer()
14 for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
15 run("column")
16 }
17 }
Figure 5 shows
22%
30.01.2024
Dell Precision Workstation T7910
Power
1,300W
CPU
2x Intel Xeon Gold E5-2699 V4, 22 cores, 2.4GHz, 55MB of cache, LGA 2011-3
GPU, NPU
n/a*
Memory
21%
13.12.2018
drive is almost twice as fast as the cheap, unbranded disk. The SanDisk drive is connecting as a USB 2 device, so despite its high quality, it falls behind in the 10MB test because the other two devices
21%
15.02.2012
of Figure 10. Figure 11 plots the Write IO function count for the KB range intervals. Figure 12 plots the Write IO function count for the MB range intervals. Figure 13 plots the Write IO function count
21%
26.01.2012
of Figure 10. Figure 11 plots the Write IO function count for the KB range intervals. Figure 12 plots the Write IO function count for the MB range intervals. Figure 13 plots the Write IO function count
21%
07.10.2014
.snap
s ntestvm1.img 5 8.0 GB 292 MB 2.4 GB 2014-03-01 11:42 982a3a 2 mar.snap
s ntestvm1.img 6 8.0 GB 128 MB 2.6 GB 2014-03-10 19:48 982a3b 2 mar2.snap
ntestvm1.img 0 8.0 GB
21%
20.06.2012
:root
bin:x:1:root,bin,daemon
daemon:x:2:root,bin,daemon
sys:x:3:root,bin,adm
adm:x:4:root,adm,daemon
tty:x:5:
disk:x:6:root
lp:x:7:daemon,lp
mem:x:8:
kmem:x:9:
wheel:x:10:root
mail:x:12:mail
uucp:x:14
