17%
02.08.2021
-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
fio-3.16
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w(1)][100.0%][w=1733KiB/s][w=433 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid
17%
18.07.2013
buffered disk reads: 616 MB in
3.00 seconds = 205.03 MB/sec
$ hdparm -T /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 6292 MB in
2.00 seconds = 3153.09 MB/sec
If this were a spinning disk, you would also
16%
04.08.2020
five-star reviews that look very similar. The problem is so evident on Amazon that customers rub their eyes in amazement wondering why the online giant doesn't intervene.
Graph databases can help
16%
05.11.2018
Name=slurm-node-0[0-1] Gres=gpu:2 CPUs=10 Sockets=1 CoresPerSocket=10 \
ThreadsPerCore=1 RealMemory=30000 State=UNKNOWN
PartitionName=compute Nodes=ALL Default=YES MaxTime=48:00:00 DefaultTime=04:00:00 \
Max
16%
05.08.2024
, as in Python [3] or Node [4].
Recent books have been published about writing shell commands in Rust [5], Python [6], Node.js [7], and even Go [8], and it is into this last language's interesting performance
16%
04.04.2023
x86_64 2.9.1-9.el8 baseos 393 k
groff-base x86_64 1.22.3-18.el8 baseos 1.0 M
hwloc-ohpc x86_64 2.7.0-3
16%
30.11.2020
):
11
12 s = 0.0
13 s += h * f(a)
14 for i in range(1, n):
15 s += 2.0 * h * f(a + i*h)
16 # end for
17 s += h * f(b)
18 return (s/2.)
19 # end def
20
21
22 # Main section
23 comm = MPI
16%
22.12.2017
:1071867223(0) win 512
98:15:eb:38:f3:c1 c8:d7:c1:61:be:a3 0.0.0.0.30693 > 0.0.0.0.57646: S 1759104040:1759104040(0) win 512
dc:6d:43:15:be:52 99:19:41:22:4e:36 0.0.0.0.29211 > 0.0.0.0.63665: S 481173385
16%
17.01.2023
x86_64 2.9.1-9.el8 baseos 393 k
groff-base x86_64 1.22.3-18.el8 baseos 1.0 M
hwloc-ohpc x86_64 2.7.0-3
16%
27.08.2014
-1600)
CentOS 6.5 (updates current as of August 22, 2014)
For testing, I used a Samsung SSD 840 Series drive that has 120GB of raw capacity (unformatted) and is connected via a SATA 3 (6Gbps) connection
