27%
09.05.2024
image is, the fewer vulnerabilities it is likely to have. According to the report, container images smaller than 100 MB had 4.4 high or critical vulnerabilities, versus 42.2 for images between 250 and 500
27%
14.11.2013
/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/csrow0/size_mb
8192
login2$ more /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/csrow0/ue_count
0
Some attribute files in /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/ can be very useful (Listing 6). As with the csrow
27%
14.08.2017
:31 FS_scan.csv
$ gzip -9 FS_scan.csv
$ ls -lsah FS_scan.csv.gz
268K -rw-r--r-- 1 laytonjb laytonjb 261K 2014-06-09 20:31 FS_scan.csv.gz
The original file is 3.2MB, but after using gzip with the -9
27%
17.04.2017
. In the test, the backup finished successfully after about 20 minutes.
After installing approximately 500MB of additional packages, I set up another system image. The Veeam agent wrote it incrementally
27%
06.10.2022
, as opposed to what theory predicts. The OpenSSL project incorporates two useful benchmarks: openssl speed [6], which tests cryptographic performance in abstract on the local machine without any network access
27%
17.09.2013
reset_counters 0 size_mb
0 ce_noinfo_count 0 csrow2 0 csrow5 0 device 0 sdram_scrub_rate 0 ue_count
0 csrow0 0 csrow3 0 csrow6 0 mc_name 0 seconds_since_reset 0 ue_noinfo_count
Notice that this system
27%
12.02.2014
.py
CPU ALL: 1.0 %
CPU0 4.1%
CPU1 2.0%
CPU2 0.0%
CPU3 0.0%
CPU4 0.0%
CPU5 0.0%
CPU6 0.0%
CPU7 2.0%
CPU ALL:
user: 0.7% nice: 0.0%
system: 0.2% idle
27%
14.06.2017
-rw-r--r-- 1 laytonjb laytonjb 261K 2014-06-09 20:31 FS_scan.csv.gz
The original file is 3.2MB, but after using gzip
with the -9
option (i.e., maximum compression), the resulting file is 268KB. The .gz
27%
29.09.2020
and – at the end – the leaf of the tree. A rather short OID could be .1.3.6.1.2.1.31. There is an analogy to IP addresses here: Because it's difficult to remember an IP address as a series of numbers, the Domain
26%
31.10.2025
of important features). All of the NAS devices in our lab used Intel processors and supported popular RAID levels, at least 1 and 5; the better devices also offered a dual-parity variant like RAID 6. (See
