13%
13.12.2022
-export-libs-9.11.36-3.el8_6.1.x86_64.rpm 579 kB/s | 1.1 MB 00:02
(6/6): warewulf-4.3.0-1.git_235c23c.el8.x86_64.rpm 746 kB/s | 8.3 MB 00
13%
12.05.2021
30.85 72.31 13.16 20.40 0.26 70.44 83.89 1.97 3.52
nvme0n1 58.80 12.22 17720.47 48.71 230.91 0.01 79.70 0.08 0.42 0.03 0
13%
02.08.2021
%util
sda 10.91 6.97 768.20 584.64 4.87 18.20 30.85 72.31 13.16 20.40 0.26 70.44 83.89 1.97 3.52
nvme0n1 58.80 12.22 17720.47 48.71 230
12%
07.01.2014
.
The approach used by Rubel has several advantages. The first is that the most recent backup, backup.0
, always contains the full backup and backup.1
through backup.
<
N
>, where <N> is the last incremental
12%
19.11.2019
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w(1)][100.0%][w=654MiB/s][w=167k IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=1225: Sat Oct 12 19:20:18 2019
write: IOPS=168k, BW=655MiB/s (687MB/s)(10.0GiB/15634msec); 0
12%
20.03.2014
(hercules) 03.12.2013 _x86_64_ (2 CPU)
09:46:03 runq-sz plist-sz ldavg-1 ldavg-5 ldavg-15 blocked
09:46:13 1 468 0.02 0.06 0.14 0
9
12%
26.02.2014
reqs merged: 3.76/s Write reqs completed: 2.12/s
Read BW: 0.01 MB/s Write BW: 0.02 MB/s
Avg sector size issued 25.28 Avg
12%
05.08.2024
run("row")
09 }
10 }
11
12 func BenchmarkColumn(b *testing.B) {
13 //b.ResetTimer()
14 for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
15 run("column")
16 }
17 }
Figure 5 shows
12%
20.05.2014
Viewing Server Topology
01 # numactl --hardware
available: 8 nodes (0-7)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
node 0 size: 16373 MB
node 0 free: 15837 MB
node 1 cpus: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
node 1
12%
07.10.2014
/lib/sheepdog
root 582 581 0 13:13 ? 12:00:00 AM sheep -p 7000 /var/lib/sheepdog
# grep sheep /proc/mounts
/dev/sdb1 /var/lib/sheepdog ext4 rw,relatime,data=ordered 0 0
# grep sheep /etc/fstab
/dev