31%
06.05.2024
module with an Intel N100, 8GB of low-power double data rate (LPDDR) memory, up to 64GB of eMMC flash storage, up to nine PCIe 3.0 lanes, up to four USB 3.2 ports, eight USB 2.0 ports, 64 GPIO pins
31%
09.04.2019
Unexplained rename() delay: https://twitter.com/jsaryer/status/1069831718389960704
GitHub, James Saryerwinnie: https://gist.github.com/jamesls/9d52c7b3a19491f4d14c2d487515115f
rename(2) man page: https
31%
28.11.2023
location, use -B <n>; -A <n> does the same thing for lines after the find. You can search compressed text archives with -z -a and a combination of options (Figure 6
31%
05.12.2014
(HostCt, ServerOwner, Date) %>%
106 arrange(desc(HostCt))
107 head12 <- head(top12, 25)
108
109 mergedTop25 <- rbind(head1,head2,head3,head4,head5,
head6,head7,head8,head9,head10,head11,head12)
110
111
31%
25.03.2020
GVzLmlvL3NlcnZpY2VhY2NvdW50L3NlcnZpY2UtYWNjb3VudC51aWQiOiJiNDVhMDhjMi1kMzg1LTQxMmItOTUwNS02YmRmODdiNjRhN2EiLCJzdWIiOiJzeXN0ZW06c2VydmljZWFjY291bnQ6ZGVmYXVsdDp0ZXN0c2VydmljZWFjY291bnQifQ.SO9XwM3zgiW6sOfEaJx1P6
31%
05.12.2019
).
Figure 1: Flattening a 2D array in C or C++.
Listing 3
inspect.c
#include
**
int a[4][5] = { // array of 4 arrays of 5 ints each, a 4x5 matrix
{ 1, 2, 3
31%
16.01.2013
$ starcluster start -s 1 foocluster -n ami-999d49f0
$ starcluster get foocluster /opt/sge6-fresh .
$ starcluster terminate foocluster
$ starcluster start -o -s 1 -i t1.micro -n ami-e2a0058b imagehost
30%
09.01.2019
of the loop, n
, is large enough, some processing hardware can greatly speed up the computation.
What happens if z(i)
depends on a previous value, as in the following:
do i = 2,n
z(i) = z(i-1)*2
enddo
30%
22.12.2017
in cs us sy id wa st
04 1 0 0 5279852 2256 668972 0 0 1724 25 965 1042 17 9 71 2 0
05 1 0 0 5269008 2256 669004 0 0 0 0 2667 1679 28 3 69 0 0
06 1 0
30%
10.12.2023
to A2 on the second storage device on the right. The third block is written to A3, and so on, in a round robin fashion. This is referred to as striping data across the two devices. As the I/O rate goes
