19%
02.08.2021
%util
sda 10.91 6.97 768.20 584.64 4.87 18.20 30.85 72.31 13.16 20.40 0.26 70.44 83.89 1.97 3.52
nvme0n1 58.80 12.22 17720.47 48.71 230
19%
30.01.2024
Dell Precision Workstation T7910
Power
1,300W
CPU
2x Intel Xeon Gold E5-2699 V4, 22 cores, 2.4GHz, 55MB of cache, LGA 2011-3
GPU, NPU
n/a*
Memory
18%
16.03.2021
B/s-1404kB/s), io=80.5MiB (84.4MB), run=60145-60145msec
Disk stats (read/write):
md0: ios=100/20614, merge=0/0, ticks=0/0, in_queue=0, util=0.00%, aggrios=103/20776, aggrmerge=0/0, aggrticks=12
17%
18.07.2013
100
100
000
Old_age
Always
–
2456
12
Power_Cycle_Count
0x0032
100
100
000
Old_age
Always
17%
26.02.2014
-sent: 22,334 (total) 0/s (Per-Sec)
pkts-recv: 68,018 (total) 2/s (Per-Sec)
lo
Bytes-sent: 2.55 K (total) 0.00 B/s (Per-Sec)
Bytes
17%
20.03.2014
all 1.22 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 98.05
12:45:01 PM all 1.32 0.00 0.72 0.01 0.00 97.95
12:55:01 PM all 1.79 0.00 0.75 0
17%
25.03.2021
[1] sdc1[0]
244065408 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
[=>...................] resync = 6.4% (15812032/244065408) finish=19.1min speed=198449K/sec
bitmap: 2/2 pages [8KB], 65536KB chunk
17%
30.11.2025
770,000 context switches show that this method creates more overhead. But, it still achieves read performance values of about 160 to 180 and 18,000 to 19,000 IOPS, as well as 110 MBps and 12,500 IOPS
17%
14.11.2013
. For example, a byte (8 bits) with a value of 156 (10011100) that is read from a file on disk suddenly acquires a value of 220 if the second bit from the left is flipped from a 0 to a 1 (11011100) for some
17%
11.02.2016
for the transmission speed, or you might have technical limits (searching through 100 million rows will take a dozen seconds or so), or you might even encounter financial limits to tuning. (Yes, an SSD could give you 10,000
