Search

Dell Precision Workstation T7910 Power 1,300W CPU 2x Intel Xeon Gold E5-2699 V4, 22 cores, 2.4GHz, 55MB of cache, LGA 2011-3 GPU, NPU n/a* Memory

rewinddir 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fsync 21 21 21 21 21 22 26 31 lseekm 3

rewinddir 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fsync 21 21 21 21 21 22 26 31 lseekm 3

(512 MB) copied, 49.1424 s, 10.4 MB/s If you want to empty the read and write cache for benchmark purposes, you can do so using: sync; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches Sequential access

/group_gz | 212 kB 00:00 Package flex-2.5.35-8.el6.x86_64 already installed and latest version Package gcc-4.4.6-3.el6.x86_64 already installed and latest version Package autoconf-2.63-5.1.el6.noarch

time: 11.79 secs Data transferred: 2.47 MB Response time: 0.22 secs Transaction rate: 35.79 trans/sec Throughput: 0

=test test: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32 fio-3.12 Starting 1 process Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w(1)][100.0%][w=654MiB/s][w=167k IOPS][eta 00m:00s

buffered disk reads: 616 MB in 3.00 seconds = 205.03 MB/sec $ hdparm -T /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 6292 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3153.09 MB/sec If this were a spinning disk, you would also

, as in Python [3] or Node [4]. Recent books have been published about writing shell commands in Rust [5], Python [6], Node.js [7], and even Go [8], and it is into this last language's interesting performance

, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32 fio-3.12 Starting 1 process Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w(1)][100.0%][w=475MiB/s][w=122k IOPS][eta 00m:00s] test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=1634: Mon Oct 14 22:18:59 2019   write: IOPS=118k, BW=463Mi