16%
03.04.2024
on machines with only one CPU core and 512MB of RAM; the minimalist K3s setup itself only uses 250MB. As one of the radical cost-cutting measures, K3s dispenses with the I/O-intensive etcd database
15%
17.02.2015
Xino-Lime
Linux
All-winner A10 processor
Single ARM Cortex-A8 @1GHz
Mali-400
512MB DDR3
SATA connector, 2 USB, Fast Ethernet, USB OTG, HDMI
1.9W
$44/EUR 30
15%
11.06.2014
application server.
On a system in a stable state, throughput initially is not affected by file operations, but after a certain value (e.g., 16,384MB), performance collapses. As Figure 1 shows
15%
11.04.2016
(512 MB) copied, 49.1424 s, 10.4 MB/s
If you want to empty the read and write cache for benchmark purposes, you can do so using:
sync; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
Sequential access
15%
25.03.2021
.00 MiB 2144.34 MB)
Raid Devices : 3
Total Devices : 3
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Sat Jan 9 16:36:21 2021
State : clean, resyncing
15%
03.02.2022
,32
1,33
2,34
3,35
4,36
5,37
6,38
7,39
8,40
9,41
10,42
11,43
12,44
13,45
14,46
15,47
16,48
17,49
18,50
19,51
20,52
21,53
22,54
23,55
24,56
25,57
26,58
27,59
28,60
29,61
30,62
31,63
The lstopo tool
15%
14.09.2021
$(find /sys/devices/system/cpu -regex ".*cpu[0-9]+/topology/thread_siblings_list") | sort -n | uniq
0,32
1,33
2,34
3,35
4,36
5,37
6,38
7,39
8,40
9,41
10,42
11,43
12,44
13,45
14,46
15,47
16,48
17,49
18,50
19,51
20,52
21,53
22,54
23,55
24,56
25
15%
28.11.2023
.json files (Listings 1 and 2) [2] to launch a Monitoror stack and supply its configuration, respectively.
Listing 1
monitoror_stack.yml
01 version: '3.5'
02 services:
03 monitoror:
04
15%
30.05.2021
on most servers, is HTTP/1.1 – even though HTTP/3 has already been defined. In this article, I look at the history of the protocol and the practical differences between versions 1.1, 2, and 3 ... HTTP/2 introduced multiplexing, resulting in superior bandwidth utilization over HTTP/1.1, and HTTP/3 solves the problem of transmission delays from packet loss by replacing TCP with QUIC. ... HTTP/1.1 versus HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
15%
14.08.2017
for your environments with Layer 3 tools. As long as two hosts have any kind of physical communication path, communication on Layer 3 works, even if the hosts in question reside in different Layer 2 segments ... Large environments such as clouds pose demands on the network, some of which cannot be met with Layer 2 solutions. The Border Gateway Protocol jumps into the breach in Layer 3 and ensures seamlessly ... Scalability in Layer 3 ... Scalable network infrastructure in Layer 3 with BGP