20%
03.02.2022
eMMC (not populated)
Network
1x Topaz networking switch
2x GbE LAN
1x Ethernet WAN
1x MiniPCIe slot
USB
1x USB 3
19%
31.10.2025
immediately notice about this device is its excellent equipment, with USB 3.0 (4x plus 4x USB2.0!), eSATA, and HDMI, optional 10Gb Ethernet (PCI Express slot), and a Sandy Bridge processor. You can retrofit
18%
02.02.2021
't be parallelized, you can tell up front, without knowing any other details about the problem, that the maximum speedup theoretically possible is 20x (Equation 3
17%
04.11.2011
.
Listing 1: Running Many Commands at Once
01 $ cat commands
02 date
03 hostname
04 echo foo | md5sum
05
06 $ cat commands | parallel
07 Thu Jul 8 10:37:20 EST 2010
08 desktop‑machine
09 d3b07384d113edec49
17%
18.07.2013
-generation SSD, being tested on a 3Gbps SATA 2 bus.
I have an 80GB Intel 320 SSD, performing remarkably close to its specified sequential read rating of 270MBps [1], but it is the second-generation drive
17%
29.10.2013
ScalingGroupName/awseb-e-hxaxpp3bsa-stack-AWSEBAutoScalingGroup-1NMEE2RF9GMBP:policyName/awseb-e-hxaxpp3bsa-stack-AWSEBAutoScalingScaleUpPolicy-1Q75QYV2QAY6X
2013-05-08 20:25:18 INFO Created CloudWatch alarm named: awseb-e-hxaxpp3
17%
17.02.2015
MinnowBoard Max
Linux, Windows 8.1
Intel E3825
Dual x86 ATOM, 64-bit @1.33GHz (1MB L2)
Intel Graphics @533MHz
2GB DDR3L
GigE Ethernet, USB 2.0, USB 3
17%
30.11.2020
the code is straightforward:
$ mpirun -n 4 -f ./hosts python3 trap-mpi4py.py
Another sample problem (Listing 8) integrates x
^2 over the interval from 0.0 to 2.0. The output contains information about what
16%
02.08.2021
%util
sda 10.91 6.97 768.20 584.64 4.87 18.20 30.85 72.31 13.16 20.40 0.26 70.44 83.89 1.97 3.52
nvme0n1 58.80 12.22 17720.47 48.71 230
16%
12.05.2021
30.85 72.31 13.16 20.40 0.26 70.44 83.89 1.97 3.52
nvme0n1 58.80 12.22 17720.47 48.71 230.91 0.01 79.70 0.08 0.42 0.03 0.00 301.34 3
